The archive peaks in the 1880s; the published Delta population observations rise later. The units differ, and the comparison is descriptive.View dataLocal record · 1920–1927
The Delta enters the record
Eight verified sources document Chinese Mississippians organizing during the school-segregation fight.
Archive gaps
The case years are missing
1924–1926
Zero candidate pages
No candidate pages survive in the assembled corpus.
Rosedale · 1924–1927
Hometown paper unavailable
The Bolivar County Democrat is digitized only through 1923.
Before 1933
No Black press in this corpus
The corpus cannot support a Black/white press comparison.
These are limits of the assembled digital corpus, not evidence of historical silence.
The peak is not a general archive effect
Each term’s 1880s rate is indexed to 100.
Chinese alone peaks in the federal exclusion era. Italian also spikes in the 1850s, often in dry-goods advertising.View dataMore dataKeyword contexts and reprint clustering.
What surrounded Chinese identity terms?
Six keyword families; passages may match more than one.
Before 1870, many Chinese hits are product labels.
How language circulated among Mississippi papers
Repeated passages show circulation, not origin.
Equal sample sizes; OCR loss makes each share a lower bound.
Denominator. All ocr.txt pages in 39 verified msar_* archives: 314,289 pages, 254 titles.
Terms. The plotted Chinese series includes Chinese, period identity terms, and Mongolian(s), but excludes standalone Celestial(s). The exclusion is rebuilt from saved passages and recorded in the downloadable audit. Controls are Irish, Italian, and cotton.
Population. The plotted Delta points are published historical summaries, not a newly executed IPUMS extract. Statewide and Delta values remain separately labeled; they are not one continuous series.
Reprints. ±300 characters; letter-only 5-grams; MinHash LSH; Jaccard ≥ 0.35; core-window recheck. 98.4% of clusters pass. The reprint browser retains the original high-recall term set, so it is an exploration aid rather than a revised prevalence measure.
Limits. These are archive rates, not statewide press prevalence. The filtered 1930s context rests on 254 passages. Corpus gaps are rendered as missing coverage, never as zero historical activity.